|
Mike Oxsaw
4:37 Wed Feb 2
Re: Baroness Jay reports (again)
|
The people who fund the police just want evidence of crimes solved. At that level they don't give a fuck about the type of crime.
The police know from that the more crimes they report as solved, the more funding they will get, so, naturally in today's fully monetized world, they will focus on the crimes that tick the most boxes the quickest - very little interest in something that straddles financial years unsolved - that just looks BAD when submitting reports to their paymasters.
More - or finer - granularity is needed in the assessment so that solving a rape or murder carries more weight in the stats than solving a nasty tweet.
That will never happen though as it will both make the stats look bad for a few years (not good for re-election) and bring more transparency/visibility, and therefore more scrutiny, of the use of police resources into the public eye.
|
Leavemyarcelona
12:04 Wed Feb 2
Re: Baroness Jay reports (again)
|
Embarrassing isn't it. No wonder some people are turning to others to expose the truth.
|
Eerie Descent
10:39 Tue Feb 1
Re: Baroness Jay reports (again)
|
Come on ffs, the old bill have got far too much on their plate dealing with tweets than worry about stuff like this.
I wonder if Sven will be along shouting 'MORE NEEDS TO BE DONE!'
|
riosleftsock
10:23 Tue Feb 1
Re: Baroness Jay reports (again)
|
Anybody using the 'racist' label towards people who call this out should then be labelled paedophiles then?
|
twoleftfeet
10:15 Tue Feb 1
Re: Baroness Jay reports (again)
|
Trouble is if you say anything then you are branded a racist.
|
|
|
|
